A few notes on the Sabbath Sunday debate

A Few Notes on the Sabbath-Sunday Debate

The Sabbatarian demand that Christian worship (which includes the breaking of bread, the apostles teaching, hymns and prayer) ought to take place on the seventh day of the week (the Jewish Sabbath) is unsupported by both the Bible and early Christian history. Whereas there is no controversy over the fact that the Jews have always worshiped on Saturday, there is no biblical command for the Christian church to continue this practice, or any example in the Scripture that they did so.

The Bible only specifies the week day of one Christian meeting, and identifies it as happening on the “first day of the week” (commonly called Sunday) in Acts 20:7. This accounts for all of the biblical record of the identification of the day of worship in a Christian context (with breaking of bread and preaching). There isn’t a single example of this type a Christian meeting happening on Saturday. I exclude the outreach of the apostles to the Synagogues – these were not Christian meetings.

Surely, if God knew that the act of worship on the first day of the week would be the “mark of the beast” (as Adventists believe), the only record of a Christian meeting for worship would not have been recorded on that day. Also, would He not have provided examples of Saturday gatherings for the purpose of Christian worship within the apostolic church?

Contrary to Sabbatarian misinformation, it was not the Roman Catholic Church that introduced the practice of Christian worship on Sunday. The Eastern church received and perpetuated the tradition of meeting on the first day of the week. The Eastern church continues to recognize that Saturday is the Jewish Sabbath, which is still a memorial of creation, but should not be confused with Sunday, and has not been replaced by Sunday.

The earliest extra-biblical records of Christian worship show that from the late first century, the first day of the week was the preferred day for Christian worship. It was the universal practice of the church in the East to gather on Sunday, centuries before the rise of the Papacy. Even those of Jewish heritage who continued to observe the Sabbath in some form gathered for Christian worship on the first day of the week, while the Gentile church never observed the Sabbath. Sabbatarians are at a loss to explain this clear fact of church history.

Here is a quote from an Eastern bishop, Ignatius of Antioch. Ignatius was a direct successor of John the apostle, and a martyr for his faith. He wrote these words about 15 years after the Revelation was written:

Those [Jews] who were brought up in the ancient order of things have come to the possession of a new hope, no longer observing the Sabbath, but living in the observance of the Lord’s day, on which also our life has sprung up again by him and by his death. (Letter to the Magnesians 8, A.D. 10)

The Eastern Orthodox Church (which is the oldest Christian tradition) continues to view the Sabbath (i.e. Saturday) as a holy day, a memorial of creation, as well as of the day that Christ rested in the tomb. However, the Orthodox recognize that Christians are no under the restrictions of Jewish law in regards to its observance.

Rome inherited the practice of Christian gathering for worship from the East, and not vice-versa. The Roman Catholic Church has a different view of Sunday than the Eastern Orthodox Church. Whereas Rome may have attempted to substitute the Sabbath with Sunday, the Eastern church recognizes that these two days are distinct, and that both have a place within Christian thought and tradition.

The institution of Sunday as the “Christian sabbath” is a false concept. It’s origin is likely from the Roman church in the fourth and fifth centuries. It was a genuine Christian tradition (not an obligation or commandment) that Rome attempted to enforce with the authority of the Mosaic law and civil laws in a grab for ecclesiastical and political power.

Rome’s improper treatment of this issue does not change the fact that history records Sunday as the universal day for Christian worship from the time of the apostles in the late first century, and their direct descendants in the early second century. It has, however, given Sabbatarians material to spin into an elaborate conspiracy theory.

The observance of any day as a Christian day of worship is a voluntary act and not a compulsory observance. If a Christian feels that a particular day is a preferred day of worship, this is fully permissible according to conscience (Romans 14:5-6) but should never be a point of judgment or condemnation between Christians (Colossians 2:16-17).

This was the position of the Protestant reformers; for example, Martin Luther wrote:

Does God require us to observe the Sabbath and other holy days of the Old Testament? The Sabbath was a sign pointing to Jesus, who is our rest. Since Jesus has come as our Savior and Lord, God no longer requires us to observe the Sabbath day and other holy days of the Old Testament. Does God require the church to worship together on any specific days? God requires Christians to worship together. He has not specified any particular day. The church worships together especially on Sunday because Christ rose from the dead on Sunday. – Small Catechism p. 66-67

About Calvin’s view of the Sabbath, scholar Richard Gaffin writes:

At the coming of Christ, the light in whose presence all shadows disappear, spiritual rest became a full reality; consequently, the weekly Sabbath as a type and sacrament was abrogated. – Calvin and the Sabbath, p. 142

One response to “A few notes on the Sabbath Sunday debate

  1. Hello,

    If SDA’s are ever persecuted (by God Himself) around the sabbath topic, it will not be by “Sunday churchers” because they keep it holy as commanded (what SDA’s deceivedly prophesy), but because SDA’s recommend (command, judaize) it to every person in the world while utterly failing to keep it holy themselves (hypocrits) due to promoting a deceived she-prophet (sin!), promoting a fake, unscriptural idol they call jesus (more sin!), and adding ideas to Revelation that are not contained in Revelation (more sin), among just a few of their spiritual crimes. Now just run all these SDA sins against God and humanity through the little sin-calculator app over in James 2:10 and see what status they have regarding their precious 4th commandment! They are totally deceived that they can keep anything or a day holy! I seem to recall Jesus commanding people to “be not deceived”, and SDA’s by nature disobey that command as well as His command to beware false she-prophets and Miller prophets in Matt 7:15-23 (good news gospel to some!). SDA’s just cannot imagine they are among the vilest, active, potent sinners in the whole world. Notice in the Matt 7 passage Jesus telling them He never knew the lawless Ellen White or SDA, Mormon, Muslim, or JW. Also notice no forgiveness mentioned!

    Are SDA’s true disciples who are enabled to deny self, as Jesus commanded? Hardly. They do nothing but sin, asserting their own evil speculations and those of that self-asserter called Ellen White. They run ahead as 2nd John 1:9-11 says, not staying within the teachings of Jesus, showing they do not have God. SDA’s sin against Jesus command to deny self at every single turn, beginning with their 1844-human-fabricated, unbiblical christ.

    In Luke 6:46-49 the good news (gospel) has Jesus saying “why do you call Me Lord, Lord, but do not what I say?” Notice the outcome is utter disaster, again no forgiveness mentioned. What does all this correlate with?? —-> “apart from Me you can do nothing” John 15:5

    It is clear to some that this keeping-sabbath-holy idea that SDA’s think they practice is none other than strong delusion, believing lies, that leads to damnation, 2nd Thess 2. SDA’s also speak lies in hypocrisy, see 1st Timothy 4:1-3

    It is truely a shame that lots of “Sunday christians” have been deceived into thinking SDA’s are wheat and not tares, who merely worship their “god” on Saturdays. The SDA god was hand-crafted, concocted in 1844 by a very deceived, rebellious group of people. That makes SDA’s automatic, direct idolators who are possessed with the spirit of antichrist, many of which are in the world. “Apart from Me you can do nothing” indeed!

    SDA’s sin against their newborns, toddlers, and youth teaching them lies, doctrines of demons, and a different “jesus” who actually never existed, never ministered, never atoned, or resurrected. Sin on a massive level. They have some nerve claiming to keep sabbath so much holier than thou! Adventism is a yuuge denial of the scriptural Christ. Adventism is 100% sin. Adventism is a conduit for blaspheming Holy Spirit.

    This all fits with 2nd Corinthians 11:4,13-15 which informs us that those who teach a perverted christ are actually ministers of Satan and will be punished for what they have done and taught.

    If SDA’s knew their true status they would be shaking like a little chihuahua trying to pass a peach pit. They would not be so smug about being remnant anything. King James Revelation 19:21 has a remnant being killed by the sword of His mouth.

    In practice, SDA’s are not allowed to simply use scripture (here they sin some more) to correct Ellen White’s copious errors and heresies (sin compounded on sin).

    True Christians do not endanger their salvation by easily proving from scripture Ellen White’s and Adventism’s hundreds of lies and errors are of the damnable sort.

Please let me know what you think! I learn from your comments.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s